Showing posts with label advertising. Show all posts
Showing posts with label advertising. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Senators Demand Restrictions on E-Cig Ads "for the Children"

Jacob Sullum, senior editor at Reason magazine and a frequent contributor to Forbes online edition — and possibly the guy most cited here at Vape Squad — has another article on the Op/Ed section, this time calling out five senators who are calling for what he calls “unconstitutional” restrictions on e-cigarette advertising.


“Despite claims from some e-cigarette makers that they do not market their products to children, e-cigarette manufacturers have adopted marketing practices similar to those long used by the tobacco industry to market regular cigarettes to youth—including flavoring their products in candy or fruit flavors that appeal to children.”

–Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.)


The five senators — Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and Edward Markey (D-Mass.), introduced legislation Wednesday “to protect children from e-cigarettes.” The legislation, titled “The Protecting Children from Electonic Cigarette Advertising Act,” authorizes the FCC to “determine what constitutes marketing e-cigarettes to children,” and to work with state attorneys general to ban any such marketing.


However, as Sullum points out, many senators and others fighting against electronic cigarettes have traditionally played very fast and loose with what amounts to advertising to children. Manufacturers producing sweet flavors, for example, or those using celebrity endorsements, have been accused of “targeting children.”


As Sullum explains in his article, however, it seems unlikely this new legislation would pass constitutional review, citing a case involving Lorillard in 2001 where courts determined that much more modest restrictions on outdoor advertising of cigarettes was “vastly overbroad,” as it interfered with the company’s ability to communicate with its adult customers.


We can’t help nodding our heads in agreement with Sullum when he says that those flavors which e-cig opponents so often claim are “clearly targeting young people” are doing no such thing. Many of the flavors vaped here at Vape Squad HQ are of the sweet variety, and there isn’t a kid anywhere in sight.


Five Senators Demand Unconstitutional Restrictions On E-Cigarette Ads—For The Children – Forbes.



Senators Demand Restrictions on E-Cig Ads "for the Children"

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Vype Advertises on UK TV

European tobacco giant British American Tobacco began airing spots for its Vype e-cigarette Monday evening.


While the New York Times treats the story as if BAT is the first company to air on UK televisions, this is certainly not the case. Advertisements for other brands, such as VIP and E-Lites, have previously been televised.


“There’s a lack of clarity among advertisers but also with consumers and we are aware of concerns that ads for e-cigarettes might be seen as cross-promoting tobacco and cigarettes through the back door.”

–Advertising Standard Authority


Past advertisements, however, were quickly pulled from the air after complaints from viewers. Due to anti-smoking regulations in the UK, depictions of cigarettes or cigarette-like objects is prohibited on television, as are references to smoking. Coupled with rules which require clearly identifying the product being advertised, UK’s e-cigarette companies have had to walk a fine line, describing their products without using any references to tobacco or cigarettes. BAT, for example, has had to change their tagline in the ads from “pure satisfaction for smokers” to “pure satisfaction for vapers.”


The Times describes the law which prohibits tobacco advertising but allows ads for electronic cigarettes as a “loophole,” which overlooks that the anti-smoking laws are in place to block the advertisement of a product proven to be hazardous, while no such hazards have been proven for electronic cigarettes. The comment is indicative of the sort of battle electronic cigarette manufacturers will have to face as legislative bodies look to revise the laws around advertising to account for electronic cigarettes: laws that have been in place for so long that it seems many have forgotten why they were enacted in the first place, and it seems a common knee-jerk reaction to try to lump electronic cigarettes into the same category, despite all evidence indicating they are not only much less hazardous than cigarettes, but quite likely are a real alternative for those looking to stop smoking.


Cigarette Ads Come Back to British TV – NYTimes.com.



Vype Advertises on UK TV