Showing posts with label saotd. Show all posts
Showing posts with label saotd. Show all posts

Thursday, May 8, 2014

University Study Discovers that Flavorings Make Stuff Taste Like Other Stuff

In what may just be the most idiotic piece of journalism we’ve stumbled upon in the history of Vape Squad, we bring you this story from the National Journal, wherein they purport to explain “how candy e-cigarette makers make their products smell like candy.”


“If you take and smell a grape Phillies blunt, you’re smelling the same chemical used in grape Kool-Aid.”

–James Pankow


They go on report the shocking discovery that what makes flavored tobacco products taste like they do is the flavorings the manufacturers put in them.


(You may note that we just said “tobacco products.” That’s because the study actually looked at flavored tobacco, not e-cigarettes. Apparently whoever wrote the headline for the National Journal couldn’t be bothered reading the article first.)


According to the piece, a study was recently performed by researchers at Portland State University in Oregon. James Pankow, leader of the study, apparently has discovered that makers of flavored tobacco products use the same artificial flavorings other people use.


We have no idea why it took a university study to figure this out. Did they think they were stuffing actual grapes into those Phillies Blunts?


How Candy E-Cigarette Makers Make Their Products Smell Like Candy – NationalJournal.com.



University Study Discovers that Flavorings Make Stuff Taste Like Other Stuff

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

SaoTD: E-Cigs May Have More Risks than Benefits

In what is basically just a repackaging of the video we posted yesterday from KSDK-5 in St. Louis. USA Today has managed to take the stupidity and crank it up a notch, with their wide distribution and sensationalist headline: “electronic cigarettes may have more risks than benefits.”  In doing so, they’ve earned the award for Stupid Article of the Day.





The video starts off sanely enough, showing how e-cigarettes help people quit cigarettes, and don’t contain the toxins and carcinogens of cigarettes… but it all goes to hell from there, when they interview Michelle Bernth of the American Cancer Society.


“Right now there’s a lot of misinformation about electronic cigarettes. The first is that they’re not harmful to your health which is not true because nicotine which we know is harmful to your health.”


This isn’t your typical no-nothing politician here. This is a representative of the American Cancer Society, making the laughable claim that nicotine is harmful to your health. While it’s true that nicotine is addictive, there are no serious health risks attributed to the substance. It is, as if often cited, no more dangerous than caffeine.


But it gets worse as Bernth goes on:


“As long as you’re inhaling nicotine and other toxic chemicals into your lungs, you’re still smoking.”


Again, this is a representative of a group that claims to be concerned with public health, and cancer in particular, effectively telling people that switching to an alternative with almost none of the carcinogens and other toxins of cigarettes is the same thing as smoking. That is plainly false, deceptive, and dangerous. Essentially, the American Cancer Society is making the claim that there is no point in switching to a safer alternative, ignoring the obvious fact that doing so could literally save millions of lives. In pushing people away from e-cigarettes, they are actually promoting cancer.


That’s not just stupid; it’s dangerous. Frankly, it really makes us wonder what motivates the American Cancer Society. Plainly, it is not an interest in sparing people from the deadly disease in their name.


Electronic cigarettes may have more risks than benefits – USA Today



SaoTD: E-Cigs May Have More Risks than Benefits

Saturday, April 27, 2013

SAotD: Could E-Cigs Change the Tobacco Industry Forever?


Our Stupid Article of the Day comes to us from The Week Magazine’s Carmel Lobello. Usually we reserve the award for writers who get facts horribly wrong, present false or misleading information, or just have really bad grammar. Lobello actually does none of these to any great extent. In this case, the journalist wins the award for dragging out practically every e-cigarette article cliche ever conceived.


First, there’s the attempt at comedy. At least we hope it was an attempt at comedy:



“And possibly the best part? They don’t smell bad.”



We’re talking about a technology that could literally save millions of lives, and the smell is the best part? Priorities. Get Some.


Next, it’s the old “flavors … such as piña colada and vanilla” could entice children to buy e-cigarettes. And yet, strangely, I’ve never seen a child drink a piña colada. Even more strangely, it’s a flavor obviously intended to appeal to adults: adults who drink alcohol, a substance most likely far more dangerous than anything in an e-cigarette. Why is it that we never hear the uproar over piña coladas leading to binge drinking in toddlers? I’ll tell you why: because it’s a non-issue when it comes to anything not related to cigarettes. For some reason, when it comes to smoking (and, by extension, vaping), everyone act like it’s a problem if it tastes good, as if people start smoking for that yummy flavor of burnt leaves. Meanwhile, they’re putting every flavor in the universe into vodka, and nobody cares. They don’t care because it’s not an actual problem. Unfortunately, anti-tobacco zealots just love the argument, no matter how ridiculous it is, and hang onto it like a baby with its favorite blanket. They’re strange that way.


Lobello even manages to work in an explosion, referring to the early 2012 incident where a man blew out his teeth and a chunk of his tongue while using an e-cigarette he had most likely either modified himself, or in which he was using dangerous batteries. She doesn’t mention that part, though… just the explosion, probably because a man being stupid isn’t nearly as salacious as an e-cigarette trying to kill someone.


Then, as the cherry on top of her sensationalism sundae, she closes with a video of Courtney Love’s NJOY F-bomb.


There’s very little we here at Vape Squad love more than a good, spirited, two-sided debate over e-cigarettes. However, when the debate turns into a headfirst dive into the muck for every last bit of overused dirt someone can scrape off the bottom, well, that’s what the Stupid Article of the Day award is here for. Congratulations, Carmel!


E-cigarettes: Could they change the tobacco industry forever? – The Week


Illustration courtesy of OtherWords



SAotD: Could E-Cigs Change the Tobacco Industry Forever?

Thursday, April 11, 2013

SAotD: A Derp Moment from Forbes

forbes com logoIt’s been several days since I’ve seen a completely nonsensical quote about e-cigarettes that I hadn’t seen a million times before. Congratulations, Forbes, for the Stupid Article of the Day. Specifically, what won the prestigious award would be this quote from contributor Ilya Pozin:



“While e-cigs aren’t considered to be real cigarettes, why do both Facebook and Google forbid their manufacturers to advertise on their sites? This leads us to question both the effects and components of this product.”



This is the stuff neck-breaking facepalms are made of. I’ve re-read this several times trying a find a way to interpret it that doesn’t mean that Pozin relies on the people who run Facebook and Google to form his opinions of a product’s effectiveness  and the quality of the ingredients used in it.


Facebook and Google don’t allow e-cigarette ads, so they must be bad?  This is some of the screwiest, most backward logic I’ve ever seen in print, and I make it my business see a lot of backward logic.


The rest of the article seems to at least attempt a balanced look at the subject, but in two short sentences, Pozin managed to completely destroy any credibility he may have otherwise had, and turn the entire article into a joke.  There’s just no way I’d be able to take an article seriously after the writer admits he bases his opinion of a product’s quality on the advertising policies of social networking sites.


Electronic Cigarettes: Booming Industry Or Health Fiasco?



SAotD: A Derp Moment from Forbes